Decision for dispute CAC-UDRP-106315

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.

ATTENTION! If an administratively compliant Response has not been filed, you may only state in this section: No administratively compliant Response has been filed. In that case you may either omit the Complainant’s contentions, or put a brief summary thereof into the Principal reasons for decision below, or specify it in this section. If an administratively compliant Response was filed, please specify the Parties´ contentions in this section. Please do not forget to erase these instructions and any of the options below which do not fit the proceedings you are deciding! NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED. PARTIES' CONTENTIONS: COMPLAINANT: RESPONDENT:

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.